CASE STUDY Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 4

theme Study Examplenquiry is present in the story, because Harris shine uped in the general bulletin sent to all employees that alike will be overhauling them recognize their strengths and what they are doing right, so that plant work can be done more effectively and efficiently. He emphasized that his presence is not due to any special(a) problem but a product of the managements desire to continuously improve (211). The management wanted to highlight the identification of strengths of the company in a positive manner, which is aligned with appreciative inquiry. In addition, when Akin conducted his research, he did not ask about problems, but inquired in such a way that will help him gain a strengths-based intellectual of the model of work at DuPont. There was no judgment or bias in his research, and instead, there was more emphasis on the strengths of the people.c) Sense-making- Sense-making is applied in the story, because Akin dumb the culture and work system of DuPont by re searching with the people. This means that together, the researcher and the workers made sense of their experiences and generated the local institution theory that people used to do their work. In addition, the research paved way in identifying and understanding the stock-car racing metaphor that the people used to explain their idea of teamwork and how they worked together.2) In your opinion, how compatible are these trio approaches? Why? What evidence is there in the DuPont story for your answer? As a change manager, to what tip could you utilize insights from each approach?For me, these approaches are compatible, because OD can use sense-making and appreciative inquiry as means of understanding the needs for change, preparing people for change, and collaborating with them to achieve organizational changes. Sense-making, for instance, helped reinforce appreciative inquiry by focusing on the meaning of their work. The evidence is that since these approaches are applied,